Crush

This is Part 2 of a three-part series on running, benchmarking, and scaling local coding agents. Part 1 covers the local Qwen setup; Part 3 explores running a larger MoE model on the same desktop hardware.

In Part 1, I got Qwen 3.6 35B A3B NVFP4 running locally on an RTX 3060 with a 64k context window and wired it into Crush, Pi, and Oh My Pi. I wanted to know how that setup compared with the terminal coding agents I already had on subscriptions. Could it finish the same tasks, and would I want to merge the patches?

This is Part 1 of a three-part series on running, benchmarking, and scaling local coding agents. In Part 2, we benchmark this setup across 640 public trials and 280 private trials on a production Go monorepo, including Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, local Qwen, and two hosted models. In Part 3, we build and test the specialized llama-moe-cache fork to run 177B Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on desktop hardware.

I wanted a capable local reasoning model for coding agents on my workstation, but my GPU is a standard desktop NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 with 12GB VRAM. Running modern 30B+ coding models locally usually demands either punishing quantization trade-offs or multiple datacenter cards.